This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CO0716
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020.
ZA and Others v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos SA.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Competition – Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restricting competition – Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and found – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-716/19.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020.
ZA and Others v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos SA.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Competition – Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restricting competition – Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and found – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-716/19.
Court reports – general
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:870
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 – Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos
(Case C‑716/19) ( 1 )
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Competition – Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restricting competition – Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and found – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Need to provide the Court with sufficient information on the factual and legislative context – Extent of the obligation in the sphere of competition – Insufficient information regarding that context – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 53(1)(c))
(see paras 13-29, 31, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling made by Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 2 de Madrid (tribunal de commerce no 2 de Madrid, Espagne), by decision of 29 July 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.
( 1 ) OJ C 423, 16.12.2019.