This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CO0513
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.
P.J. v (X) S.A.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure — Lack of sufficient detail concerning the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-513/19.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.
P.J. v (X) S.A.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure — Lack of sufficient detail concerning the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-513/19.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:953
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 — P.J.
(Case C‑513/19)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure — Lack of sufficient detail concerning the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the factual context — Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94)
(see paras 14-24, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie (District Court for Warsaw-Wola, in Warsaw, Poland), by decision of 21 March 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.