This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CO0038
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.
Marion Le Pen v European Parliament.
Appeal — European Parliament — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid.
Case C-38/19 P.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.
Marion Le Pen v European Parliament.
Appeal — European Parliament — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid.
Case C-38/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:952
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 —
Le Pen v Parliament
(Case C‑38/19 P) ( 1 )
(Appeal — European Parliament — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid)
1. |
Appeal — Grounds — Grounds which are manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded — Dismissal at any point, by reasoned order, without an oral procedure (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181) (see para. 31) |
2. |
EU law — Principles — Rights of defence — Right to be heard — Scope — Obligation to make it possible for the interested party to express herself orally — None (see paras 39-43) |
3. |
Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 170(1)) (see para. 47) |
4. |
European Parliament — Members — Payment of expenses and allowances — Parliamentary assistance allowances — Check relating to the use of parliamentary assistance costs — Burden of proof (Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament, Art. 33(1) and (2)) (see paras 49-52) |
5. |
EU law — Principles — Protection of legitimate expectations — Limits (Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament, Arts 33(1) and 39(2)) see paras 64-69 |
6. |
Appeal — Grounds — Specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning necessary — None — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU, Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para., Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paras 85-87) |
Operative part
1. |
The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |
2. |
Ms Marion Anne Perrine Le Pen shall pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.