Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CO0038

    Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.
    Marion Le Pen v European Parliament.
    Appeal — European Parliament — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid.
    Case C-38/19 P.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:952

     Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 —
    Le Pen v Parliament

    (Case C‑38/19 P) ( 1 )

    (Appeal — European Parliament — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid)

    1. 

    Appeal — Grounds — Grounds which are manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded — Dismissal at any point, by reasoned order, without an oral procedure

    (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181)

    (see para. 31)

    2. 

    EU law — Principles — Rights of defence — Right to be heard — Scope — Obligation to make it possible for the interested party to express herself orally — None

    (see paras 39-43)

    3. 

    Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Manifest inadmissibility

    (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 170(1))

    (see para. 47)

    4. 

    European Parliament — Members — Payment of expenses and allowances — Parliamentary assistance allowances — Check relating to the use of parliamentary assistance costs — Burden of proof

    (Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament, Art. 33(1) and (2))

    (see paras 49-52)

    5. 

    EU law — Principles — Protection of legitimate expectations — Limits

    (Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament, Arts 33(1) and 39(2))

    see paras 64-69

    6. 

    Appeal — Grounds — Specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning necessary — None — Manifest inadmissibility

    (Art. 256 TFEU, Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para., Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))

    (see paras 85-87)

    Operative part

    1. 

    The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

    2. 

    Ms Marion Anne Perrine Le Pen shall pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.

    Top