This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CJ0122
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020.
Hamas v Council of the European Union.
Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Fight against terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Conditions – Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority – Sentencing decision – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection.
Case C-122/19 P.
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020.
Hamas v Council of the European Union.
Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Fight against terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Conditions – Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority – Sentencing decision – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection.
Case C-122/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:690
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020 – Hamas v Council
(Case C‑122/19 P) ( 1 )
(Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Fight against terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Conditions – Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority – Sentencing decision – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection)
|
1. |
Common foreign and security policy – Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Decision to freeze funds – Retention on the basis of a national decision to freeze funds – National decision no longer by itself supporting the conclusion that there is an ongoing risk of involvement in acts of terrorism – Obligation of the Council to take into account more recent facts which demonstrate that that risk is ongoing (Council Common Position 2001/931, Art. 1(6)) (see paras 37, 38) |
|
2. |
Common foreign and security policy – Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Decision to freeze funds – Adoption or maintenance on the basis of a national decision to investigate, prosecute or convict – Competent authority to adopt that national decision – Concept – Non judicial authority – Included (Council Common Position 2001/931, Art. 1(4)) (see paras 43, 44) |
|
3. |
Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Decision to freeze funds directed against certain persons and entities suspected of terrorist activities – Minimum requirements (Art. 296, second para., TFEU; Council Common Position 2001/931, Art. 1(4); C 2011/430/CFSP, 2011/872/CFSP, 2012/333/CFSP, 2012/765/CFSP, 2013/395/CFSP, 2014/72/CFSP and 2014/483/CFSP; Council Regulations No 687/2011, No 1375/2011, No 542/2012, No 1169/2012, No 714/2013, No 125/2014 and No 790/2014) (see paras 53, 54) |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Hamas shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission. |
( 1 ) OJ C 131, 8.4.2019.