Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TO0388

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 January 2020.
WV v European External Action Service.
Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of request — Article 90(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations — Out of time — Excusable error — Inadmissible.
Case T-388/18.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:27

 Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 January 2020 –
WV v EEAS

(Case T‑388/18)

(Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of request — Article 90(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations — Out of time — Excusable error — Inadmissible)

Actions brought by officials — Prior administrative complaint — Time limits — Mandatory — Point from which time starts to run — Implied decision rejecting a request for assistance — Complaint lodged out of time — Excusable error — Limits — Inadmissibility

(Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91)

(see paras 81, 82, 84, 89, 93, 94)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of an implied decision of the EEAS, alleged to have been made on 4 September 2017, rejecting the request for assistance lodged by the applicant and, second, the EEAS’ decision of 28 March 2018 dismissing the applicant’s complaint of 29 November 2017 against the implied rejection.

Operative part

1. 

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. 

WV shall pay the costs.

Top