Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TJ0518

    Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 May 2020.
    YG v European Commission.
    Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion procedure – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 9 – Comparison of the merits – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to state reasons.
    Case T-518/18.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:221

     Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 May 2020 –
    YG v Commission

    (Case T‑518/18)

    (Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion procedure – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 9 – Comparison of the merits – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to state reasons)

    1. 

    Officials – Promotion – Consideration of comparative merits – Procedures – Administration’s discretion – Limits – Respect for the principle of equal treatment – Judicial review – Limits – Manifest error of assessment – Concept

    (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 45)

    (see paras 33, 34, 36, 37, 49, 55)

    2. 

    Officials – Promotion – Consideration of comparative merits – Administration’s discretion – Scope – Taking account of staff reports

    (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 45)

    (see para. 35)

    3. 

    Officials – Promotion – Complaint by a candidate not promoted – Decision to reject – Obligation to state reasons – Scope – Inadequate statement of reasons – Regularisation during the proceedings – Conditions

    (Art. 296 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 41; Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 25, second para., 45 and 90(2))

    (see paras 41, 58-61)

    4. 

    Judicial proceedings – Costs – Costs caused unreasonably or vexatiously – Conduct of an institution having encouraged the bringing of the action

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 135(2))

    (see paras 69, 70)

    Re:

    Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 13 November 2017 not to promote the applicant in the 2017 promotion procedure.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

    Top