Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TJ0403

    Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
    Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark WS wellpharma shop — Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
    Case T-403/18.

    Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2019 –
    Pharmadom v EUIPO — Objectif Pharma (WS wellpharma shop)

    (Case T‑403/18)

    (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark WS wellpharma shop — Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    1. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Criteria for assessment

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see para. 18)

    2. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Similarity of the marks concerned — Criteria for assessment — Composite mark

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 19, 20)

    3. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Prior registration of the trade mark in certain Member States — Effect

    (see para. 42)

    4. 

    EU trade mark — Decisions of the Office — Legality — Examination by the EU judicature — Criteria

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001)

    (see para. 43)

    5. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Similarity of the marks concerned — Visual similarity between a figurative mark and a word mark

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see para. 47)

    6. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Weighing elements of similarity or difference between the signs — Taking into account of the intrinsic characteristics of the signs or the conditions in which the goods or services are marketed

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see para. 64)

    7. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Figurative mark WS wellpharma shop and word mark WELL AND WELL

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 66-69)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2018 (Case R 1448/2017-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Pharmadom and Objectif Pharma.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Pharmadom to pay the costs.

    Top