Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TJ0229

    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 5 June 2019.
    Biolatte Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Biolatte — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
    Case T-229/18.

    Court reports – general

    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 5 June 2019 — Biolatte v EUIPO (Biolatte)

    (Case T‑229/18)

    (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Biolatte — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    1. 

    EU trade mark — Appeals procedure — Action before the EU judicature — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Direction issued to the Office — Not included

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72(6))

    (see para. 15)

    2. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of distinctive character — Word mark Biolatte

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paras 23-25, 33, 42-46, 48, 67, 74-76, 86, 100)

    3. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of distinctive character — Concept — Criteria for assessment

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see para. 30)

    4. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of distinctive character — Assessment of distinctive character — Criteria

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paras 31, 52)

    5. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of distinctive character — Exception — Distinctive character acquired through use — Criteria for assessment

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(3))

    (see para. 93)

    Re

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2018 (Case R 351/2017-1), relating to an application for registration of the word sign Biolatte as an EU trade mark.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Biolatte Oy to pay the costs.

    Top