Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018CO0166

    Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 June 2018.
    Idroenergia Scrl v Agenzia delle dogane e dei Monopoli - Ufficio delle Dogane di Caserta.
    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility.
    Case C-166/18.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 June 2018 — Idroenergia

    (Case C‑166/18)

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)

    Questions referred for a preliminary ruling—Admissibility—Reference giving no details of the relevant facts or legislation and not setting out the reasons for making that reference to the Court of Justice—Manifest inadmissibility

    (Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94)

    (see paras 11-27)

    Operative part

    The request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria regionale per la Campania (Regional tax commission for the Campania region, Italy), by decision of 1 February 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.

    Top