This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018CJ0413
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019.
H v Council of the European Union.
Appeal — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — Composition of the Chamber of the General Court of the European Union — Regularity — Decision 2009/906/CFSP — European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (EUPM) — National staff member on secondment — Redeployment to a regional office of that mission — Powers of the Head of Mission — Misuse of powers — Claim for damages — Principle of audi alteram partem.
Case C-413/18 P.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019.
H v Council of the European Union.
Appeal — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — Composition of the Chamber of the General Court of the European Union — Regularity — Decision 2009/906/CFSP — European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (EUPM) — National staff member on secondment — Redeployment to a regional office of that mission — Powers of the Head of Mission — Misuse of powers — Claim for damages — Principle of audi alteram partem.
Case C-413/18 P.
Court reports – general
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:1044
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019 — H v Council
(Case C‑413/18 P) ( 1 )
(Appeal — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — Composition of the Chamber of the General Court of the European Union — Regularity — Decision 2009/906/CFSP — European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (EUPM) — National staff member on secondment — Redeployment to a regional office of that mission — Powers of the Head of Mission — Misuse of powers — Claim for damages — Principle of audi alteram partem)
1. |
Judicial proceedings — Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings — Amplification of a plea made earlier — Admissibility (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 127(1) and 175) (see paras 27, 28, 35) |
2. |
EU law — Principles — Fundamental rights — Compliance ensured by the EU judicature — Right of all persons to a fair hearing — Guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Taking into consideration the European Convention on Human Rights — Requirement of impartiality — Same judge sitting in two chambers that had to hear the same case successively — No infringement (Art. 6(3) TEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47, first and second paras; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 26(2), 27(1) and 216(1)) (see paras 45-47, 50, 51, 54, 55, 57-60) |
3. |
EU law — Principles — Rights of defence — Principle of audi alteram partem — Compliance in the context of judicial proceedings — Scope — Decision based on answers and documents that were provided by a party after the hearing and were not the subject of an exchange of arguments with the other party — Infringement (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47) (see points 102-104, 114-116) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 11 April 2018, H v Council (T‑271/10 RENV, EU:T:2018:180); |
2. |
Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for a ruling on the third, fourth and fifth pleas of the action for annulment and on the claim for compensation; |
3. |
Orders that the costs be reserved. |
( 1 ) OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.