Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CJ0342

    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019.
    Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.
    Appeal — Internal market in natural gas — Directive 2009/73/EC — Article 32 — Third-party access — Article 41(6), (8) and (10) — Rules on tariffs — Article 36 — Application for an exemption — Rules governing the operation of the OPAL pipeline — National regulatory authority — Exemption decision — Request for modification — European Commission Decision — Action for annulment — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Admissibility — Decision of no direct concern to the appellant.
    Case C-342/18 P.

    Court reports – general

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:1043

     Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019 — Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo v Commission

    (Case C‑342/18 P) ( 1 )

    (Appeal — Internal market in natural gas — Directive 2009/73/EC — Article 32 — Third-party access — Article 41(6), (8) and (10) — Rules on tariffs — Article 36 — Application for an exemption — Rules governing the operation of the OPAL pipeline — National regulatory authority — Exemption decision — Request for modification — European Commission Decision — Action for annulment — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Admissibility —Decision of no direct concern to the appellant)

    1. 

    Action for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Conditions cumulative in nature — Inadmissibility of the action where just one of those conditions not met

    (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU)

    (see paras 35-37)

    2. 

    Action for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Whether directly concerned — Criteria — Commission Decision addressed to a national regulatory authority, requiring it to modify a decision for exemption from the EU rules governing the operation of a pipeline — Discretion of the national regulatory authority responsible for its implementation — Characterisation — Not directly concerned — Inadmissibility

    (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU; European Parliament and Council Directive 2009/73, Art. 36)

    (see paras 38, 39, 42-54)

    3. 

    Fundamental rights — Right to effective judicial protection — Review of legality of EU measures — Procedures — Protection of that right by the EU judicature or by the national courts according to the legal nature of the contested measure — Possibility of using an annulment action or reference for a preliminary ruling on validity

    (Arts 19(1) TEU; Arts 263, fourth para., 267 and 277 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47)

    (see paras 62, 63)

    4. 

    Judicial proceedings — Objection of inadmissibility — Power of the General Court to rule immediately on the objection of inadmissibility without ruling on the substance — Extent of its discretion

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 130)

    (see paras 73, 74, 77)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2. 

    Orders Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. to pay its own costs and bear those incurred by the European Commission;

    3. 

    Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay its own costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.

    Top