Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TO0447

    Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 December 2018.
    Carlos Bowles v European Central Bank.
    Civil Service — ECB Staff — Appointment decision concerning the post of Adviser to the President and Coordinator of the Counsel to the Executive Board — No act adversely affecting the applicant — No interest in bringing proceedings — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
    Case T-447/17.

    Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 December 2018 –
    Bowles v ECB

    (Case T‑447/17)

    (Civil Service — ECB Staff — Appointment decision concerning the post of Adviser to the President and Coordinator of the Counsel to the Executive Board — No act adversely affecting the applicant — No interest in bringing proceedings — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

    1. 

    Judicial proceedings — Decision taken by way of reasoned order — Conditions — Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking any foundation in law

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 126)

    (see paras 14, 15)

    2. 

    Actions brought by officials — Action against a decision rejecting a complaint — Effect — Disputed measure referred to the Court — Exception — Decision not confirmatory in character

    (Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91)

    (see paras 19, 22)

    3. 

    Actions brought by officials — Staff of the European Central Bank — Acts adversely affecting an official — Concept — Direct appointment decision concerning the post of Coordinator of the Counsel to the Executive Board — Not included

    (Art. 270 TFEU; Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91; European Central Bank Staff Rules, Art. 1a.7(d))

    (see paras 33, 34, 36, 45-48, 53)

    4. 

    Officials — Acts of the administration — Implied decision — Concept

    (see para. 54)

    5. 

    Actions brought by officials — Interest in bringing proceedings — Need for an actual and current interest — Assessment at the time when the action was brought — Action capable of securing a benefit for the applicant

    (Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91)

    (see paras 74-77, 83-85)

    6. 

    Actions brought by officials — Application for damages linked to an application for annulment — Dismissal of the application for annulment leading to dismissal of the application for damages

    (Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91)

    (see paras 103-105)

    Re:

    Action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, the annulment (i) of the decision of the Executive Board of the ECB of 31 January 2017 to appoint M.S. to the post of Adviser to the President and Coordinator of the Counsel to the Executive Board (ii) of the decision not to appoint the applicant to that post and (iii) of the decision not to allow the applicant to apply for that post and, secondly, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

    Operative part

    1. 

    The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

    2. 

    Mr Carlos Bowles shall pay the costs.

    Top