This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0801
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2018.
Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 3-star-guarantee.de — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-801/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2018.
Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 3-star-guarantee.de — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-801/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2018 –
Dermatest v EUIPO (ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 3-star-guarantee.de)
(Case T‑801/17)
(EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 3-star-guarantee.de — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
1. |
EU trade mark — Appeals procedure — Action before the EU judicature — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Re-evaluation of the facts in the light of evidence produced for the first time before it — Not included (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65) (see para. 15) |
2. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Aim — Need to preserve availability — Scope of the examination (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see para. 20) |
3. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Meaning — Mark composed of a word or neologism resulting from a combination of elements (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 21-23, 36) |
4. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Assessment of the descriptive nature of a sign — Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see para. 43) |
5. |
EU trade mark — Decisions of the Office — Principle of equal treatment — Principle of sound administration — EUIPO’s previous decision-making practice — Principle of legality — Need for a strict and complete examination in each particular case (Council Regulation No 207/2009) (see paras 57, 58) |
6. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Figurative mark ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 3-star-guarantee.de (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 59, 66) |
7. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Overlap of the scope of the grounds set out in Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b) and (c)) (see para. 65) |
8. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Exception — Distinctive character acquired through use — Probative value of the evidence (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(3)) (see paras 71, 73, 74) |
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2017 (Case R 524/2017-4), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 3-star-guarantee.de as an EU trade mark.
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Köperpflegemitteln mbH to pay the costs. |