This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0796
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 February 2019.
Mouldpro ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MOULDPRO — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative grounds for invalidity — Article 60(1)(b) and Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-796/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 February 2019.
Mouldpro ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MOULDPRO — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative grounds for invalidity — Article 60(1)(b) and Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-796/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 February 2019 –
Mouldpro v EUIPO — Wenz Kunststoff (MOULDPRO)
(Case T‑796/17)
(EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MOULDPRO — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative grounds for invalidity — Article 60(1)(b) and Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001)
1. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Relative grounds for invalidity — Absence of consent on the part of the proprietor of a mark to the registration applied for by an agent or a representative under its own name — Agent or representative — Concept (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 8(3) and 60(1)(b)) (see paras 22, 23) |
2. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Relative grounds for invalidity — Absence of consent on the part of the proprietor of a mark to the registration applied for by an agent or a representative under its own name — Agent or representative — Aim (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 8(3) and 60(1)(b)) (see para. 24) |
3. |
EU trade mark — Appeals procedure — Action brought against a decision by the Cancellation Division of EUIPO — Examination by the Board of Appeal — Scope (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 95) (see para. 27) |
4. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Relative grounds for invalidity — Existence of an earlier right referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation No 2017/1001 — Word mark MOULDPRO and company name Mouldpro ApS (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 8(4) and 60(1)(c)) (see paras 50-56, 70-73) |
5. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Relative grounds for invalidity — Existence of an earlier right referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation No 2017/1001 — Conditions — Interpretation in the light of EU law — Assessment by reference to the criteria determined by the national law governing the sign relied on (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(4)) (see paras 61, 62) |
6. |
Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Pleas in law not set out in the application — Reference to the whole of the annexes — Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 177(1)(d)) (see para. 65) |
7. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Relative grounds for invalidity — Existence of an earlier right referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation No 2017/1001 — Local significance of sign (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 8(4) and 60(1)(c)) (see para. 69) |
8. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Applicant in bad faith when filing the trade mark application — Criteria for assessment — Taking into account of all relevant factors at the time of filing the application for registration — Applicant’s knowledge that a third party is using an identical or similar sign — Intention of the applicant — Degree of legal protection of the signs at issue — Origin and use of the sign in dispute — Commercial logic underlying the registration of the contested sign as an EU trade mark — Chronology of events characterising the filing of the trade mark application (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 8(2) and 59(1)(b)) (see paras 77-84) |
9. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Applicant in bad faith when filing the trade mark application — Word mark MOULDPRO (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 8(2) and 59(1)(b)) (see paras 95-106) |
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 October 2017 (Case R 2153/2015-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mouldpro and Wenz Kunststoff.
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Mouldpro ApS to pay the costs. |