Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TJ0760

    Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 March 2019.
    Meesenburg Großhandel KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard.
    Case T-760/17.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 March 2019 –
    Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+)

    (Case T‑760/17)

    (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard)

    1. 

    EU trade mark — Appeals procedure — Action before the EU judicature — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Amendment of a decision by the Office — Assessment having regard to the competences conferred on the Board of Appeal

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65(3))

    (see para. 12)

    2. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Assessment of distinctive character — Criteria

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paras 18, 20)

    3. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Definition — Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paras 19, 32, 33)

    4. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Word sign Triotherm+

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paras 22, 23, 34, 36)

    5. 

    Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Similar requirements for submissions made in support of a plea

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 177(1)(d))

    (see para. 25)

    6. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Overlap of the scope of the grounds set out in Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b) and (c))

    (see para. 31)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2017 (Case R 1786/2016-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Triotherm+ as an EU trade mark.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Meesenburg Großhandel KG to pay the costs.

    Top