This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0760
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 March 2019.
Meesenburg Großhandel KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard.
Case T-760/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 March 2019.
Meesenburg Großhandel KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard.
Case T-760/17.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 March 2019 –
Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+)
(Case T‑760/17)
(EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard)
1. |
EU trade mark — Appeals procedure — Action before the EU judicature — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Amendment of a decision by the Office — Assessment having regard to the competences conferred on the Board of Appeal (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65(3)) (see para. 12) |
2. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Assessment of distinctive character — Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 18, 20) |
3. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Definition — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 19, 32, 33) |
4. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Word sign Triotherm+ (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 22, 23, 34, 36) |
5. |
Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Similar requirements for submissions made in support of a plea (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 177(1)(d)) (see para. 25) |
6. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Overlap of the scope of the grounds set out in Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b) and (c)) (see para. 31) |
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2017 (Case R 1786/2016-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Triotherm+ as an EU trade mark.
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Meesenburg Großhandel KG to pay the costs. |