Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TJ0221

    Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 April 2018.
    Mémora Servicios Funerarios SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MEMORAME — Earlier EU figurative mark mémora and earlier national word marks MÉMORA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
    Case T-221/17.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 April 2018 –
    Mémora Servicios Funerarios v EUIPO — Chatenoud (MEMORAME)

    (Case T‑221/17)

    (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MEMORAME — Earlier EU figurative mark mémora and earlier national word marks MÉMORA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    1. 

    EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 23, 24)

    2. 

    EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Similarity between the goods or services in question—Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see para. 26)

    3. 

    EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Similarity between the goods or services in question—Complementary nature of the goods or services

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 31, 34, 35)

    4. 

    EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Word mark MEMORAME—Figurative mark mémora and word marks MÉMORA

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 41-49)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2017 (Case R 1308/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Mémora Servicios Funerarios and Mr Chatenoud.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Mémora Servicios Funerarios SLU to pay the costs.

    Top