1. 

Appeal—Grounds—Error of law relied on not identified—Ground lacking precision—Inadmissibility

(Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169)

(see paras 12-14)

2. 

Procedure—Application initiating proceedings—Formal requirements—Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 169)

(see para. 15)

3. 

Appeal—Grounds—Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court—Inadmissibility

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)

(see para. 22)

4. 

Appeal—Grounds—Mistaken assessment of the facts—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted

(Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)

(see paras 26, 27)

1. 

The appeals are dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2. 

NF, NG and NM shall pay the costs.