This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0648
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2018.
Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BOBO cornet — Prior EU figurative mark OZMO cornet — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-648/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2018.
Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BOBO cornet — Prior EU figurative mark OZMO cornet — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-648/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2018 —
Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Zaharieva (BOBO cornet)
(Case T‑648/16)
(European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BOBO cornet — Prior EU figurative mark OZMO cornet — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
|
1. |
EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 25, 26, 93) |
|
2. |
EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Similarity of the marks concerned—Criteria for assessment—Composite mark—Determination of the dominant elements(s) (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 28, 29, 34, 35) |
|
3. |
EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Figurative marks BOBO cornet and OZMO cornet (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 57-63, 77-84, 94-98) |
|
4. |
EU trade mark—Procedural provisions—Statement of reasons for decisions—Article 75, first sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009—Scope identical to that of Article 296 TFEU (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 75, first sentence) (see para. 101) |
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 July 2016 (Case R 906/2015-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret and Ms Zaharieva.
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to pay the costs. |