Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TJ0479

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 June 2017.
Colgate-Palmolive Co. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark AROMASENSATIONS — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-479/16.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 June 2017 —
Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)

(Case T‑479/16)

(EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark AROMASENSATIONS — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

1. 

EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Concept — Criteria for assessment

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b))

(see paras 15-17, 19, 24)

2. 

EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Marks constituted of advertising slogans — Distinctive character — Application of specific criteria for assessment — Not permissible

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b))

(see para. 18)

3. 

EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Marks constituted of advertising slogans — Flattering promotional formula

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b))

(see para. 20)

4. 

EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Figurative mark AROMASENSATIONS

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b))

(see paras 22, 25-27, 35, 37)

5. 

EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Assessment of the registrability of a sign — EU rules only taken into account — Earlier registration of the mark in certain Member States or third countries — Decisions not binding EU bodies

(Council Regulation No 207/2009)

(see para. 40)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 (Case R 2482/2015-2), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign AROMASENSATIONS as an EU trade mark.

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Colgate-Palmolive Co. to pay the costs.

Top