Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TJ0430

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 March 2017.
Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark BRENT INDEX — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-430/16.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 March 2017 — Intercontinental Exchange Holdings v EUIPO (BRENT INDEX)

(Case T‑430/16)

(EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark BRENT INDEX — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

1. 

EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service—Aim—Need to preserve availability

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c))

(see para. 16)

2. 

EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service—Concept

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c))

(see paras 17, 18)

3. 

EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service—Concept—Mark composed of a word or neologism resulting from a combination of elements

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c))

(see paras 19, 20)

4. 

EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service—Word mark BRENT INDEX

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c))

(see paras 28-35, 38-40)

5. 

EU trade mark—Decisions of the Office—Principle of equal treatment—Principle of sound administration—EUIPO’s previous decision-making practice—Principle of legality—Need for a strict and complete examination in each particular case

(see paras 44-46)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2016 (Case R 8/2016-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign BRENT INDEX as an EU trade mark.

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. to pay the costs.

Top