Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TJ0286

    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 June 2017.
    Ernst Kneidinger v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a toilet seat — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
    Case T-286/16.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 June 2017 —
    Kneidinger v EUIPO — Topseat International (toilet seat)

    (Case T‑286/16)

    (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a toilet seat — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

    1. 

    Community designs — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Design not giving the informed user a different overall impression from that produced by the earlier design — Overall assessment of all the elements of the prior design

    (Council Regulation No 6/2002, Arts 6(1), and 25(1)(b))

    (see paras 15-17, 35, 45)

    2. 

    Community designs — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Design not giving the informed user a different overall impression from that produced by the earlier design — Informed user — Concept

    (Council Regulation No 6/2002, Arts 6(1), and 25(1)(b))

    (see paras 19, 20)

    3. 

    Community designs — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Design not giving the informed user a different overall impression from that produced by the earlier design — Criteria for assessment — Creative licence

    (Council Regulation No 6/2002, Arts 6(2), and 25(1)(b))

    (see paras 25, 26)

    4. 

    Community designs — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Design not giving the informed user a different overall impression from that produced by the earlier design — Representation of a toilet seat

    (Council Regulation No 6/2002, Arts 6(1), and 25(1)(b))

    (see paras 40-43, 45, 50)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 April 2016 (Case R 1030/2015-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Topseat International and Mr Kneidinger.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Mr Ernst Kneidinger to pay the costs.

    Top