EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0220
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 March 2019.
Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark PRO PLAYER — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-220/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 March 2019.
Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark PRO PLAYER — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-220/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 March 2019 –
Perry Ellis International Group v EUIPO (PRO PLAYER)
(Case T‑220/16)
(EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark PRO PLAYER — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
1. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Meaning (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 18, 19, 21, 28) |
2. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Word mark composed of several elements — Taking into account the overall perception of the mark by the relevant public (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see para. 20) |
3. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Word mark PRO PLAYER (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 32-35, 43) |
4. |
EU trade mark — Decisions of the Office — Principle of equal treatment — Principle of sound administration — EUIPO’s previous decision-making practice — Principle of legality — Need for a strict and complete examination in each particular case (see para. 40) |
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2016 (Case R 1091/2015-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign PRO PLAYER as an EU trade mark.
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |