This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0215
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 April 2017.
Cop Vertriebs-GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark AMPHIBIAN — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-215/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 April 2017.
Cop Vertriebs-GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark AMPHIBIAN — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-215/16.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 April 2017 —
Cop v EUIPO — Conexa (AMPHIBIAN)
(Case T‑215/16)
(EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark AMPHIBIAN — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
1. |
EU trade mark—Appeals procedure—Action before the EU judicature—Condition of admissibility—Grounds of appeal directed only against decisions of the Boards of Appeal (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65(1)) (see para. 12) |
2. |
EU trade mark—Appeals procedure—Action before the EU judicature—Jurisdiction of the General Court—Re-evaluation of the facts in the light of evidence produced for the first time before it—Precluded (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65) (see para. 18) |
3. |
Community trade mark—Appeals procedure—Action before the EU judicature—Legality of the decision of a Board of Appeal—Account taken, for the purposes of applying EU law, of national legislation, case-law or academic writing—Lawfulness (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65) (see para. 21) |
4. |
EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Prior registration of the trade mark in certain Member States—Effect (see para. 22) |
5. |
EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service—Aim—Need to preserve availability (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see para. 33) |
6. |
EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service—Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 34-37) |
7. |
EU trade mark—Surrender, revocation and invalidity—Absolute grounds for invalidity—Registration contrary to Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009—Figurative mark AMPHIBIAN (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 39-47, 55) |
8. |
EU trade mark—Procedural provisions—Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion—Invalidity proceedings concerning absolute grounds for refusal—Examination restricted to the submissions of the parties (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1), 52, 55 and 76(1)) (see paras 49-51) |
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2016 (Case R 1984/2015-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Cop and Conexa.
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Cop Vertriebs-GmbH to pay the costs. |