EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0752
Case T-752/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — NLMK v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Use of facts available — Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury — Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Causal link — Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Elimination of injury — Rights of the defence — Equality of arms — Principle of good administration — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Manifest errors of assessment)
Case T-752/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — NLMK v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Use of facts available — Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury — Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Causal link — Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Elimination of injury — Rights of the defence — Equality of arms — Principle of good administration — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Manifest errors of assessment)
Case T-752/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — NLMK v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Use of facts available — Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury — Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Causal link — Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Elimination of injury — Rights of the defence — Equality of arms — Principle of good administration — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Manifest errors of assessment)
OJ C 462, 15.11.2021, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 22/09/2021
- Date lodged:
- 28/10/2016
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62016TJ0752
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
15.11.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 462/34 |
Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — NLMK v Commission
(Case T-752/16) (1)
(Dumping - Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Use of facts available - Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) - Determination of injury - Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) - Causal link - Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) - Elimination of injury - Rights of the defence - Equality of arms - Principle of good administration - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Manifest errors of assessment)
(2021/C 462/39)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) (Lipetsk, Russia) (represented by: D. O’Keeffe, Solicitor, N. Tuominen and M. Krestiyanova, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, K. Blanck and E. Schmidt, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Eurofer, European Steel Association, ASBL, (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: O. Prost, A. Coelho Dias and S. Seeuws, lawyers)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 of 29 July 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation (OJ 2016 L 210, p. 1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission; |
|
3. |
Orders Eurofer, European Steel Association, ASBL, to bear its own costs. |
