Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016CO0687

    Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 June 2017.
    Capella EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark ELGO — Rejection of the application for registration.
    Case C-687/16 P.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 June 2017 — Capella v EUIPO

    (Case C‑687/16 P)

    (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark ELGO — Rejection of the application for registration)

    1. 

    Appeal—Grounds—Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court—Error of law relied on not identified—Inadmissibility

    (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d))

    (see para. 4)

    2. 

    Appeal—Grounds—Lack of specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning and of legal arguments in support of the appeal—Inadmissibility

    (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d) and Art. 169)

    (see para. 4)

    3. 

    Appeal—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted

    (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)

    (see para. 4)

    Operative part

    1. 

    The appeal is dismissed.

    2. 

    Capella EOOD is ordered to pay the costs.
    Top