This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CO0389
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 November 2016.
BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark AROMA — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) and (c) — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case C-389/16 P.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 November 2016.
BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark AROMA — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) and (c) — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case C-389/16 P.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 November 2016 —
BSH Hausgeräte v EUIPO
(Case C‑389/16 P)
(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark AROMA — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) and (c) — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded )
|
|
Appeals—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 6) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
BSH Hausgeräte GmbH is to bear its own costs. |