EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CJ0208
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2018.
Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.
Appeal — State aid — German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying certain losses forward to future tax years (‘restructuring clause’) — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Actions for annulment — Admissibility — Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU — Person individually concerned — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Condition relating to selectivity — Determination of the reference framework — Legal classification of the facts.
Case C-208/16 P.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2018.
Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.
Appeal — State aid — German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying certain losses forward to future tax years (‘restructuring clause’) — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Actions for annulment — Admissibility — Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU — Person individually concerned — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Condition relating to selectivity — Determination of the reference framework — Legal classification of the facts.
Case C-208/16 P.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2018 — Germany v Commission
(Case C‑208/16 P) ( 1 )
(Appeal — State aid — German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying certain losses forward to future tax years (‘restructuring clause’) — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Actions for annulment — Admissibility — Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU — Person individually concerned — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Condition relating to selectivity — Determination of the reference framework — Legal classification of the facts)
|
1. |
Actions for annulment—Natural or legal persons—Measures of direct and individual concern to them—Individual concern—Conditions—Commission decision prohibiting a sectoral aid scheme—Action brought by the beneficiaries of aid granted under that scheme—Admissibility—Conditions—Particular qualities or a factual situation characterising the applicant as compared with any other person (Arts 107(1) TFEU and 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 46-48) |
|
2. |
Appeal—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Review by the Court of the findings of fact—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted—Review of the legal classification given to the facts of the dispute—Included (Art. 256 TFEU) (see paras 72, 73) |
|
3. |
State aid—Definition—Selective nature of the measure—Measure conferring a tax advantage—Reference framework for determining the existence of an advantage—Criteria (Art. 107(1) TFEU) (see paras 80, 81, 83-89, 101, 102) |
|
4. |
State aid—Definition—Grant by the public authorities of favourable tax treatment to certain undertakings—Included—Advantages resulting from a general measure applicable without distinction to all economic operators—Not included (Art. 107(1) TFEU) (see para. 82) |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
dismisses the cross-appeal; |
|
2. |
annuls paragraphs 2 and 3 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 4 February 2016, Heitkamp BauHolding v Commission (T‑287/11, EU:T:2016:60); |
|
3. |
annuls Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel); |
|
4. |
orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs relating both to the proceedings at first instance and to the appeal proceedings, the costs incurred by the Federal Republic of Germany relating to appeal proceedings and the costs incurred by Mr Dirk Andres, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Heitkamp BauHolding GmbH, relating to both the proceedings at first instance and to the appeal proceedings. |