Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016CA0392

    Case C-392/16: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Dumitru Marcu v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF), Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 199(1)(c) — No VAT registration — Reverse charge — Hypothetical nature of the question referred — Inadmissibility of the question referred)

    OJ C 283, 28.8.2017, p. 10–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.8.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 283/10


    Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Dumitru Marcu v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF), Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București

    (Case C-392/16) (1)

    ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 199(1)(c) - No VAT registration - Reverse charge - Hypothetical nature of the question referred - Inadmissibility of the question referred))

    (2017/C 283/14)

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Referring court

    Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Dumitru Marcu

    Defendants: Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF), Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București

    Operative part of the judgment

    The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Court of Appeal, Bucharest, Romania) is inadmissible.


    (1)  OJ C 350, 26.9.2016.


    Top