1. 

Actions for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Interest to be assessed at the time at which an action is brought — Action brought against a measure producing binding legal effects on the applicant — Repeal of the contested act in the course of the proceedings — Declaration that no need to adjudicate — Not permissible — Applicant maintaining an interest in obtaining recognition that the contested act unlawful (Arts 263 TFEU and 266 TFEU) (see paras 23, 25)

2. 

Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Whether directly concerned — Criteria — Decisions of the European Central Bank on the provision of emergency liquidity to Greek banks — Action by an undertaking considering itself prejudiced by the adoption of national measures applying those decisions — No automaticity between the national measures and the contested decisions — No direct concern — Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 29, 33, 36-38)

3. 

Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Application for compensation for damage allegedly caused by an EU institution — Imprecision as to the conduct alleged against that institution, the nature of the damage and the causal link — Inadmissibility — No infringement of the right to effective judicial protection (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para., and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paras 42, 46)

1. 

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. 

Alcimos Consulting SMPC is ordered to pay the costs.