1. 

Appeal — Pleas in law — Pleas seeking modification of the reasoning of a judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal — Criticism of grounds having no influence on the operative part of the judgment under appeal — Inadmissibility

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Annex I, Art. 9)

(see para. 36)

2. 

Appeal — Grounds — No precise criticism of a point of reasoning of the Civil Service Tribunal and no legal arguments in support of the appeal — Inadmissibility

(Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 194)

(see para. 41)

3. 

Officials — Non-contractual liability of the institutions — Conditions — Unlawfulness — Damage — Causal link

(see paras 48, 77)

4. 

Actions brought by officials — Actions for damages — Annulment of the illegal act in dispute — Whether appropriate reparation for non-material damage

(Staff Regulations, Art. 91)

(see paras 72, 83)

5. 

Appeal — Grounds — Review by the General Court of the assessment of the evidence made by the Civil Service Tribunal — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted — Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence — Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and showing the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion

(Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 195(2))

(see paras 84, 85)

1. 

Dismisses the appeal;

2. 

Orders DD to bear his own costs;

3. 

Orders the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) to bear its own costs.