Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62015TJ0389

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 March 2017.
J & Joy SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — EU figurative mark J&JOY — Earlier national figurative mark joy SPORTSWEAR — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Assessment criteria — Composite mark — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-389/15.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 March 2017 —
J & Joy v EUIPO — Joy-Sportswear (J&JOY)

(Case T‑389/15)

(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — EU figurative mark J&JOY — Earlier national figurative mark joy SPORTSWEAR — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Assessment criteria — Composite mark — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

1. 

EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Criteria for assessment

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 16, 28, 82)

2. 

EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Figurative mark J&JOY and figurative mark SPORTSWEAR

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 21, 22, 29, 96, 97)

3. 

EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Similarity between the goods or services in question—Criteria for assessment

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 33, 34)

4. 

EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Similarity of the marks concerned—Criteria for assessment—Composite mark

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 37, 55, 68)

5. 

EU trade mark—Decisions of the Office—Legality—Examination by the EU judicature—Criteria

(Council Regulation No 207/2009)

(see para. 62)

6. 

EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Weak distinctive character of the earlier mark—Effect

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see para. 92)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 April 2015 (Case R 1355/2014-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Joy-Sportswear and J & Joy.

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

Dismisses the action;

2. 

Orders J & Joy SA to pay the costs.
Top