This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CO0608
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 July 2016.
Panasonic Corp. v European Commission.
Appeal — Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 181 — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market-sharing, customer-allocation and output-limitation — Rights of the defence — Statement of objections — Content.
Case C-608/15 P.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 July 2016.
Panasonic Corp. v European Commission.
Appeal — Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 181 — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market-sharing, customer-allocation and output-limitation — Rights of the defence — Statement of objections — Content.
Case C-608/15 P.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 —
Panasonic v Commission
(Case C‑608/15 P) ( *1 )
‛Appeal — Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 181 — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market-sharing, customer-allocation and output-limitation — Rights of the defence — Statement of objections — Content’
Competition — Administrative procedure — Statement of objections — Necessary content — Observance of the rights of the defence — Scope (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 27(1)) (see paras 20-24)
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Panasonic Corp. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
( *1 ) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.