This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CO0526
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 October 2016.
Uber Belgium BVBA v Taxi Radio Bruxellois NV.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Inadmissibility — Transportation of persons by motor vehicles — Private drivers using a smart phone application to connect them to people wishing to travel within urban areas — Requirement to hold an operating permit.
Case C-526/15.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 October 2016.
Uber Belgium BVBA v Taxi Radio Bruxellois NV.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Inadmissibility — Transportation of persons by motor vehicles — Private drivers using a smart phone application to connect them to people wishing to travel within urban areas — Requirement to hold an operating permit.
Case C-526/15.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 October 2016 – Uber Belgium
(Case C-526/15) ( 1 )
‛Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Inadmissibility — Transportation of persons by motor vehicles — Private drivers using a smart phone application to connect them to people wishing to travel within urban areas — Requirement to hold an operating permit’
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 53(2) and 94) (see paras 17-30, 32, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van koophandel Brussel (Flemish-language Commercial Court, Brussels, Belgium), by decision of 23 September 2015, is manifestly inadmissible.
( 1 ) OJ C 429, 21.12.2015.