This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CA0580
Case C-580/15: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, West-Vlaanderen, afdeling Brugge — Belgium) — Maria Eugenia Van der Weegen, Miguel Juan Van der Weegen, Anna Pot, acting as successors in title to Johannes Van der Weegen, deceased, Anna Pot v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 56 TFEU — Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area — Tax legislation — Income tax — Tax exemption reserved to interest payments by banks complying with certain statutory conditions — Indirect discrimination — Banks established in Belgium and banks established in another Member State)
Case C-580/15: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, West-Vlaanderen, afdeling Brugge — Belgium) — Maria Eugenia Van der Weegen, Miguel Juan Van der Weegen, Anna Pot, acting as successors in title to Johannes Van der Weegen, deceased, Anna Pot v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 56 TFEU — Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area — Tax legislation — Income tax — Tax exemption reserved to interest payments by banks complying with certain statutory conditions — Indirect discrimination — Banks established in Belgium and banks established in another Member State)
Case C-580/15: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, West-Vlaanderen, afdeling Brugge — Belgium) — Maria Eugenia Van der Weegen, Miguel Juan Van der Weegen, Anna Pot, acting as successors in title to Johannes Van der Weegen, deceased, Anna Pot v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 56 TFEU — Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area — Tax legislation — Income tax — Tax exemption reserved to interest payments by banks complying with certain statutory conditions — Indirect discrimination — Banks established in Belgium and banks established in another Member State)
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 08/06/2017
- Date lodged:
- 09/11/2015
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Dutch
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62015CJ0580
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
31.7.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 249/6 |
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, West-Vlaanderen, afdeling Brugge — Belgium) — Maria Eugenia Van der Weegen, Miguel Juan Van der Weegen, Anna Pot, acting as successors in title to Johannes Van der Weegen, deceased, Anna Pot v Belgische Staat
(Case C-580/15) (1)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 56 TFEU - Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area - Tax legislation - Income tax - Tax exemption reserved to interest payments by banks complying with certain statutory conditions - Indirect discrimination - Banks established in Belgium and banks established in another Member State))
(2017/C 249/08)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, West-Vlaanderen, afdeling Brugge
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Maria Eugenia Van der Weegen, Miguel Juan Van der Weegen, Anna Pot, acting as successors in title to Johannes Van der Weegen, deceased, Anna Pot
Defendant: Belgische Staat
Operative part of the judgment
Article 56 TFEU and Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for a national tax exemption system, to the extent that that system, although applicable without distinction to income from savings deposits held with banking service providers established in Belgium or in another Member State of the European Economic Area, imposes conditions for access to the Belgian banking market on service providers established in other Member States, this being a matter for the referring court to verify.
