This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0527
Case T-527/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — Rosenich v EUIPO (Internal market — Decision of EUIPO rejecting a request for inclusion on the list of professional representatives — Condition relating to the existence of a place of business within the European Union — Article 93(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Freedom to provide services — Article 36 of the EEA Agreement — Consistent interpretation)
Case T-527/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — Rosenich v EUIPO (Internal market — Decision of EUIPO rejecting a request for inclusion on the list of professional representatives — Condition relating to the existence of a place of business within the European Union — Article 93(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Freedom to provide services — Article 36 of the EEA Agreement — Consistent interpretation)
Case T-527/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — Rosenich v EUIPO (Internal market — Decision of EUIPO rejecting a request for inclusion on the list of professional representatives — Condition relating to the existence of a place of business within the European Union — Article 93(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Freedom to provide services — Article 36 of the EEA Agreement — Consistent interpretation)
OJ C 283, 28.8.2017, p. 30–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 13/07/2017
- Date lodged:
- 15/07/2014
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - successful
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62014TJ0527
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
28.8.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 283/30 |
Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — Rosenich v EUIPO
(Case T-527/14) (1)
((Internal market - Decision of EUIPO rejecting a request for inclusion on the list of professional representatives - Condition relating to the existence of a place of business within the European Union - Article 93(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Freedom to provide services - Article 36 of the EEA Agreement - Consistent interpretation))
(2017/C 283/43)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Paul Rosenich (Triesenberg, Liechtenstein) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and C. Eckhartt, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: initially, G. Schneider and, subsequently, D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2014 (Case R 2063/2012-4), concerning the refusal of EUIPO to enter the applicant on the list of professional representatives provided for in Article 93 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 April 2014 (Case R 2063/2012-4); |
|
2. |
Annuls the decision of the Director of the Operations Support Department of EUIPO of 7 September 2012; |
|
3. |
Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
