This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0422
Case T-422/14: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Viscas v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Single and continuous infringement — Proof of the infringement — Duration of participation — Public distancing — Calculation of the fine — Gravity of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Case T-422/14: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Viscas v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Single and continuous infringement — Proof of the infringement — Duration of participation — Public distancing — Calculation of the fine — Gravity of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Case T-422/14: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Viscas v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Single and continuous infringement — Proof of the infringement — Duration of participation — Public distancing — Calculation of the fine — Gravity of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)
OJ C 328, 17.9.2018, p. 32–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
17.9.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 328/32 |
Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Viscas v Commission
(Case T-422/14) (1)
((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for power cables - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Single and continuous infringement - Proof of the infringement - Duration of participation - Public distancing - Calculation of the fine - Gravity of the infringement - Unlimited jurisdiction))
(2018/C 328/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Viscas Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by J.-F. Bellis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by C. Giolito, L. Parpala, H. van Vliet and A. Biolan, acting as Agents, and by B. Doherty, Barrister)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Furukawa Electric Co. Ltd (Tokyo) (represented by C. Pouncey, A. Luke and L. Geary, Solicitors)
Re:
Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39610 — Power cables) in so far as it concerns the applicant and, in the alternative, an application for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant in that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Viscas Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission; |
3. |
Orders Furukawa Electric Co. Ltd to bear its own costs. |