Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CJ0360

    Germany v Commission

    Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2015 —

    Germany v Commission

    (Case C‑360/14 P) ( 1 )

    ‛Appeal — Approximation of laws — Directive 2009/48/EC — Toy safety — Limit values for lead, barium, arsenic, antimony, mercury and nitrosamines and nitrosatable substances in toys — Commission decision not to approve in full the national provisions notified by the German authorities maintaining the limit values for those substances — Proof of a higher level of protection for human health offered by the national provisions’

    1. 

    Approximation of laws — Article 114 TFEU — Procedure for approval of national provisions in derogation — Possibility of the applicant Member State basing its request on an assessment of the public health risk different from that used by the EU legislature — Obligation to establish a higher level of public health protection than the EU harmonisation measure — Duty to comply with the principle of proportionality (Art. 114(4) TFEU) (see paras 33, 34)

    2. 

    Approximation of laws — Article 114 TFEU — Procedure for approval of national provisions in derogation — Application seeking maintenance of pre-existing national provisions — Discretion of the Commission — Judicial review — Scope (Art. 114(4) TFEU) (see paras 35-42)

    3. 

    Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 55, 56, 68)

    4. 

    Appeals — Grounds — Inadequate or contradictory grounds — Scope of the obligation to state reasons — Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning — Lawfulness — Conditions (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 81) (see paras 69-71)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2. 

    Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

    Top

    Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2015 —

    Germany v Commission

    (Case C‑360/14 P) ( 1 )

    ‛Appeal — Approximation of laws — Directive 2009/48/EC — Toy safety — Limit values for lead, barium, arsenic, antimony, mercury and nitrosamines and nitrosatable substances in toys — Commission decision not to approve in full the national provisions notified by the German authorities maintaining the limit values for those substances — Proof of a higher level of protection for human health offered by the national provisions’

    1. 

    Approximation of laws — Article 114 TFEU — Procedure for approval of national provisions in derogation — Possibility of the applicant Member State basing its request on an assessment of the public health risk different from that used by the EU legislature — Obligation to establish a higher level of public health protection than the EU harmonisation measure — Duty to comply with the principle of proportionality (Art. 114(4) TFEU) (see paras 33, 34)

    2. 

    Approximation of laws — Article 114 TFEU — Procedure for approval of national provisions in derogation — Application seeking maintenance of pre-existing national provisions — Discretion of the Commission — Judicial review — Scope (Art. 114(4) TFEU) (see paras 35-42)

    3. 

    Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 55, 56, 68)

    4. 

    Appeals — Grounds — Inadequate or contradictory grounds — Scope of the obligation to state reasons — Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning — Lawfulness — Conditions (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 81) (see paras 69-71)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2. 

    Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

    Top