This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014CJ0031
OHMI / Kessel
OHMI / Kessel
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 –
OHIM v Kessel medintim
(Case C‑31/14 P) ( 1 )
‛Appeal — Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark Premeno — Opposition from the proprietor of the earlier national word mark Pramino — Limitation of the goods designated in the Community trade mark application — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 43(1)’
Community trade mark — Registration procedure — Withdrawal, restriction and amendment of the trade mark application — Application to restrict the list of goods or services — Requirement of clarity (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 43(1); Commission Regulation No 2868/95, Art. 1, Rule 2(2)) (see paras 36, 37)
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the costs; |
|
3. |
Orders Janssen-Cilag GmbH to bear its own costs. |
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 –
OHIM v Kessel medintim
(Case C‑31/14 P) ( 1 )
‛Appeal — Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark Premeno — Opposition from the proprietor of the earlier national word mark Pramino — Limitation of the goods designated in the Community trade mark application — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 43(1)’
Community trade mark — Registration procedure — Withdrawal, restriction and amendment of the trade mark application — Application to restrict the list of goods or services — Requirement of clarity (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 43(1); Commission Regulation No 2868/95, Art. 1, Rule 2(2)) (see paras 36, 37)
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the costs; |
|
3. |
Orders Janssen-Cilag GmbH to bear its own costs. |