This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TO0539
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 April 2016.
Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE v European Commission.
Action for annulment — Seventh framework programme for research and technological development including demonstration activities (2007-2013) — MARE, Senior and ECRN projects — Recovery of a share of the financial contribution paid — Enforcement decision — Nature of the pleas relied on — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-539/13.
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 April 2016.
Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE v European Commission.
Action for annulment — Seventh framework programme for research and technological development including demonstration activities (2007-2013) — MARE, Senior and ECRN projects — Recovery of a share of the financial contribution paid — Enforcement decision — Nature of the pleas relied on — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-539/13.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 April 2016 —
Inclusion Alliance for Europe v Commission
(Case T‑539/13)
‛Action for annulment — Seventh framework programme for research and technological development including demonstration activities (2007-2013) — MARE, Senior and ECRN projects — Recovery of a share of the financial contribution paid — Enforcement decision — Nature of the pleas relied on — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law’
|
1. |
Application for interim measures — Admissibility criteria — Application — Formal requirements — No separate document — Inadmissibility (Art. 278 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 104(2) and (3)) (see paras 73-75) |
|
2. |
Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — None — Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)) (see paras 76-78, 99-101, 115, 136, 138) |
|
3. |
Actions for annulment — Action against a writ of execution — Decision open to challenge under Article 263 TFEU — Admissibility — Pleas relating to contractual stipulations and the applicable national law — Inadmissibility (Arts 263 TFEU, 272 TFEU, 288 TFEU and 299 TFEU) (see paras 84-91, 97, 116, 120, 123, 128) |
Re:
ACTION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 4693 final of 17 July 2013 concerning the recovery of a sum of EUR 212411.89, plus interest, owed by the applicant in the context of the MARE, Senior and ECRN projects.
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE is ordered to pay the costs. |