This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TJ0297
Junited Autoglas Deutschland v OHMI - Belron Hungary (United Autoglas)
Junited Autoglas Deutschland v OHMI - Belron Hungary (United Autoglas)
Keywords
Subject of the case
Operative part
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 19-21, 60)
2. Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Similarity of the marks concerned — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 25, 27, 41, 47, 50)
3. Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Word mark United Autoglas and figurative mark AUTOGLASS (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 31-36, 53, 59, 63, 64)
4. Community trade mark — Decisions of the Office — Legality — Examination by the Community judicature — Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009) (see para. 38)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2013 (Case R 206/2012‑2) concerning opposition proceedings between Belron Hungary Kft — Zug Branch and Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG.
Operative part
The Court:
1. Dismisses the action;
2. Orders Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 October 2014 — Junited Autoglas Deutschland v OHIM — Belron Hungary (United Autoglas) (Case T‑297/13)
‛Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark United Autoglas — Earlier national figurative mark AUTOGLASS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009’
1. |
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 19-21, 60) |
2. |
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Similarity of the marks concerned — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 25, 27, 41, 47, 50) |
3. |
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Word mark United Autoglas and figurative mark AUTOGLASS (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 31-36, 53, 59, 63, 64) |
4. |
Community trade mark — Decisions of the Office — Legality — Examination by the Community judicature — Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009) (see para. 38) |
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2013 (Case R 206/2012‑2) concerning opposition proceedings between Belron Hungary Kft — Zug Branch and Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG.
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |