Case C‑122/13

Paola C.

v

Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze)

‛Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2004/80/EC — Article 12 — Compensation of victims of violent intentional crime — Purely internal situation — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court’

Summary — Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber), 30 January 2014

1. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction of the Court — Limits — Request for interpretation of provisions of EU law manifestly inapplicable in the main proceedings

   (Art. 267 TFEU; Council Directive 2004/80, Art. 12)

2. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction of the Court — Limits — Question raised regarding a dispute within a single Member State — Jurisdiction in the light of the possible applicability of the rule of EU law to the dispute by reason of a prohibition of discrimination laid down by national law — Need for the referring court to indicate that national law does impose such a prohibition

   (Art. 267 TFEU)

1.  See the text of the decision.

   (see paras 12-14)

2.  See the text of the decision.

   (see paras 15-17)

Case C‑122/13

Paola C.

v

Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze)

‛Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2004/80/EC — Article 12 — Compensation of victims of violent intentional crime — Purely internal situation — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court’

Summary — Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber), 30 January 2014

1. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction of the Court — Limits — Request for interpretation of provisions of EU law manifestly inapplicable in the main proceedings

   (Art. 267 TFEU; Council Directive 2004/80, Art. 12)

2. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction of the Court — Limits — Question raised regarding a dispute within a single Member State — Jurisdiction in the light of the possible applicability of the rule of EU law to the dispute by reason of a prohibition of discrimination laid down by national law — Need for the referring court to indicate that national law does impose such a prohibition

   (Art. 267 TFEU)

1.  See the text of the decision.

   (see paras 12-14)

2.  See the text of the decision.

   (see paras 15-17)