Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013CJ0015

Summary of the Judgment

Case C‑15/13

Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg

and

Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH

v

Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH

(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg)

‛Public supply contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Award of a contract without initiating a tendering procedure — In-house award — Contractor legally separate from the contracting authority — Condition of ‘similar control’ — Contracting authority and contractor not linked by a relationship of control — Third party public authority exercising partial control over the contracting authority and control over the contractor which could be qualified as ‘similar’ — ‘Horizontal in-house transaction’’

Summary — Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 8 May 2014

Approximation of laws — Procedure for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2004/18 — Scope — Contracts awarded by a contracting authority to an entity partly owned by a third party public authority exercising partial control over the contracting authority, albeit legally distinct from the latter — Included

(European Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18, Art. 1(2)(a))

Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a contract for the supply of products concluded between (i) a university which is a contracting authority and whose purchases of products and services are controlled by a German Federal State, and (ii) an undertaking under private law, owned by the Federation and by Federal States, including the abovementioned Federal State, constitutes a public contract for the purposes of that provision, and must therefore be subject to the public procurement rules laid down in that directive.

(see para. 36, operative part)

Top

Case C‑15/13

Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg

and

Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH

v

Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH

(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg)

‛Public supply contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Award of a contract without initiating a tendering procedure — In-house award — Contractor legally separate from the contracting authority — Condition of ‘similar control’ — Contracting authority and contractor not linked by a relationship of control — Third party public authority exercising partial control over the contracting authority and control over the contractor which could be qualified as ‘similar’ — ‘Horizontal in-house transaction’’

Summary — Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 8 May 2014

Approximation of laws — Procedure for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2004/18 — Scope — Contracts awarded by a contracting authority to an entity partly owned by a third party public authority exercising partial control over the contracting authority, albeit legally distinct from the latter — Included

(European Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18, Art. 1(2)(a))

Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a contract for the supply of products concluded between (i) a university which is a contracting authority and whose purchases of products and services are controlled by a German Federal State, and (ii) an undertaking under private law, owned by the Federation and by Federal States, including the abovementioned Federal State, constitutes a public contract for the purposes of that provision, and must therefore be subject to the public procurement rules laid down in that directive.

(see para. 36, operative part)

Top