Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 61991TJ0018

    Summary of the Judgment

    Keywords
    Summary

    Keywords

    ++++

    1. Officials ° Actions ° Request for information regarding an official' s statutory rights ° Treated in the same way as a prior administrative complaint under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations ° Not permissible

    (Staff Regulations, Art. 90(2))

    2. Officials ° Remuneration ° Expatriation allowance ° Official not a national of the Member State where he is employed ° Habitual residence during the reference period as a student away from the place of employment ° Prior residence at the place of employment ° Not relevant ° Conditions for grant satisfied

    (Staff Regulations, Annex VII, Art 4(1)(a))

    Summary

    1. A letter does not constitute a prior administrative complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations where the official, while expressing his disagreement with the measures taken by the administration with regard to him, requests the administration to review its position and then to adopt a reasoned decision, when the formal appearance of that letter is not that of a complaint, the letter has not been sent through the immediate superior and in accordance with the relevant institution' s internal regulations with regard to complaints, and was also not treated by the administration as a complaint within the meaning of the Staff Regulations.

    In those circumstances, such a letter constitutes a mere request for information regarding the statutory rights of the person concerned.

    2. Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations is to be interpreted as giving entitlement to an expatriation allowance to an official who is not and never has been a national of the State in whose territory the place where he is employed is situated, and, during the reference period referred to in that provision, has resided permanently outside that State, even if he resided there prior to that period; it is not necessary to enquire in clear cases whether, in reintegrating himself into the environment of his place of employment, the person concerned is subject to precisely the same extra expense and inconvenience as an official who has never resided there.

    The fact that the person concerned resided as a student outside the Member State where he is employed does not preclude him from receiving the expatriation allowance.

    Top