English
Select your language
Official EU languages:
Access to European Union law
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
Document 62016TJ0344
Case T-344/16
T-344/16
General Court
Status: Closed
T-344/16
General Court
Status: Closed
/
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2018. Richard Hugh Blackmore v European Union Intellectual Property Office. EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark DEEP PURPLE — Earlier non-registered mark DEEP PURPLE — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rules governing common-law action for passing-off — No likelihood of misrepresentation — Article 177(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Inadmissibility. Case T-344/16.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:T:2018:648
- Applicant
- Individual
- Defendant
- EU institutions and bodies, European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Collins
- Type of procedure
- Action for annulment - inadmissible,Action for annulment - unfounded
- Complementary documents:
04/10/2018
CASE BROUGHT
- Title
- Case T-344/16: Action brought on 27 June 2016 — Blackmore v EUIPO — Paice (DEEP PURPLE)
29/08/2016