Case C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17, C-438/17Court of Justice
Status:
In progress![](./../../../images/CuriaLogo.png)
Case C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17, C-438/17
DECISION
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2019:342
30/04/2019
- Title
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019. Bashar Ibrahim and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and Bundesrepublik
Deutschland v Taus Magamadov. Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht. Reference for a preliminary
ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection —
Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for asylum as being
inadmissible because of the prior granting of subsidiary protection in another Member State — Article 52 — Scope ratione temporis
of that directive — Articles 4 and 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Systemic flaws in the asylum
procedure in that other Member State — Systematic rejection of applications for asylum — Substantial risk of suffering inhuman
or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted subsidiary protection in that other State. Joined Cases C-297/17,
C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2019:219
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Ilešič
- Type of procedure
- Reference for a preliminary ruling,Reference for a preliminary ruling - decision unnecessary
19/03/2019
PROCEEDINGS
- Title
- Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 July 2018. Bashar Ibrahim and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and
Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Taus Magamadov. Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht. Reference
for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international
protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for
asylum as being inadmissible because of the prior granting of subsidiary protection in another Member State — Article 52 —
Scope ratione temporis of that directive — Articles 4 and 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union —
Systemic flaws in the asylum procedure in that other Member State — Systematic rejection of applications for asylum — Substantial
risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted subsidiary protection in that other
State. Joined Cases C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2018:617
- Advocate General
- Wathelet
25/07/2018