EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
Document 62016TN0118
Case T-118/16
General Court
Status: Closed
General Court
Status: Closed
/
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 February 2018. Deutsche Post AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office. EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark BEPOST — Earlier EU figurative mark ePost and earlier national word mark POST — Non-registered mark or sign used in the course of trade POST — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) — No detriment to reputation and no dilution — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court. Case T-118/16.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:T:2018:86
- Defendant
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Iliopoulos
- Type of procedure
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Complementary documents:
09/04/2018
- Title
- Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 February 2018. Deutsche Post AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office. EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark BEPOST — Earlier EU figurative mark ePost and earlier national word mark POST — Non-registered mark or sign used in the course of trade POST — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) — No detriment to reputation and no dilution — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court. Case T-118/16.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:T:2018:86
- Defendant
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Iliopoulos
- Type of procedure
- Action for annulment - unfounded
20/02/2018
CASE BROUGHT
- Title
- Case T-118/16: Action brought on 23 March 2016 — Deutsche Post v EUIPO — bpost (BEPOST)
10/05/2016