Case T-445/16

DECISION

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 February 2018 (Extracts). Schniga GmbH v Community Plant Variety Office. Plant variety rights — Application for Community plant variety rights for the plant variety Gala Schnico — Technical examination — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Uniformity — Article 8 of Regulation No 2100/94 — Complementary examination — Article 57(3) of Regulation No 2100/94 — Equal treatment — Examination of the facts by the CPVO of its own motion — Article 76 of Regulation No 2100/94. Case T-445/16.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:95
Applicant: Individual
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office, EU institutions and bodies
Judge-Rapporteur: Kornezov
Type of procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded,Action for annulment - inadmissible
Complementary documents:: Communication published in the Official Journal

Summary

09/04/2018

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 February 2018 (Extracts). Schniga GmbH v Community Plant Variety Office. Plant variety rights — Application for Community plant variety rights for the plant variety Gala Schnico — Technical examination — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Uniformity — Article 8 of Regulation No 2100/94 — Complementary examination — Article 57(3) of Regulation No 2100/94 — Equal treatment — Examination of the facts by the CPVO of its own motion — Article 76 of Regulation No 2100/94. Case T-445/16.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:95
Applicant: Individual
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office, EU institutions and bodies
Judge-Rapporteur: Kornezov
Type of procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded,Action for annulment - inadmissible

23/02/2018

Title: Case T-445/16: Action brought on 5 August 2016 — Schniga v CPVO (Gala Schnico)

03/10/2016