EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
Document 62015TA0233
Case T-233/15
General Court
Status: Closed
General Court
Status: Closed
/
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 October 2017. Cofra Holding AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office. EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark 1841 — Earlier national word mark AD-1841-TY — Relative ground for refusal — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Taking into account of additional evidence — Articles 57(2) and 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 64(2) and 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rule 40(6) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430) — Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001). Case T-233/15.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:T:2017:714
- Applicant
- Individual
- Defendant
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Csehi
- Type of procedure
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Complementary documents:
27/11/2017
- Title
- Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 October 2017. Cofra Holding AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office. EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark 1841 — Earlier national word mark AD-1841-TY — Relative ground for refusal — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Taking into account of additional evidence — Articles 57(2) and 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 64(2) and 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rule 40(6) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430) — Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001). Case T-233/15.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:T:2017:714
- Applicant
- Individual
- Defendant
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Csehi
- Type of procedure
- Action for annulment - unfounded
10/10/2017
CASE BROUGHT
- Title
- Case T-233/15: Action brought on 11 May 2015 — Cofra v OHIM — Armand Thiery (1841)
29/06/2015