English
Select your language
Official EU languages:
Access to European Union law
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
Document 62012CJ0121
/
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 3 October 2013. Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 74(2) — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — First and third subparagraphs of Rule 50(1) — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark — Existence of the mark — Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose — Failure to take account thereof — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Provision to the contrary — Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account. Case C‑121/12 P.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2013:639
- Applicant
- Individual
- Defendant
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Bay Larsen
- Type of procedure
- Appeal - unfounded,Action for annulment,Appeal - inadmissible
03/10/2013
PROCEEDINGS
- Title
- Advocate General’s Opinion - 16 May 2013 Rintisch v OHIM Case C-121/12 P Advocate General: Sharpston
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2013:312
16/05/2013