EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
Document 62017CO0232_INF
Case C-232/17
Court of Justice
Status: Closed
Court of Justice
Status: Closed
/
CASE BROUGHT
- Title
- Case C-232/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 4 May 2017 — VE v WD
07/08/2017
DECISION
- Title
- Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2017. VE v WD. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság. Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Credit agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility. Case C-232/17.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2017:907
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Prechal
- Type of procedure
- Reference for a preliminary ruling - inadmissible
- Complementary documents:
21/11/2017
- Title
- Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2017. VE v WD. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság. Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Credit agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility. Case C-232/17.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2017:907
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Prechal
- Type of procedure
- Reference for a preliminary ruling - inadmissible
29/01/2018